Fictional case · No account required

Follow a finding back to the record.

Follow Alex Testcase through five selected findings from the same seven-page packet used in the trial.

This guided illustration uses the seven-page Alex Testcase packet with hand-authored summaries. It demonstrates the workflow, not AI accuracy, processing speed, or a completed QME report. Your choices stay in this tab and reset on reload.

Alex Testcase · SYN-2024-001 · Seven PDF pages. Open the five selected findings below. PDF page 7 duplicates page 4; page 1 contains referral questions. Printed footers restart on page 3: use PDF viewer page numbers for citations.

Try the reviewer’s job in three steps

0 of 3 steps complete · Practice only; this does not certify a review.

1. Follow a citation. Select a page citation below and read the source behind the finding.

Your answers stay in this tab and reset on reload. You can explore all samples without completing the exercise.

Chronology

0 of 5 example entries marked reviewed. This count does not certify a complete review.

2024-03-12 · PDF page 3

The worker reported lumbar pain after the February 1 lifting incident and denied prior back injury.

Sunrise Spine & Pain Clinic

“Denies prior back injury.”

The quotation matches this fictional source. Clinical meaning still needs review.

2024-03-28 · PDF page 4

The MRI described an L4-L5 disc protrusion contacting the left L5 nerve root. PDF page 7 repeats this report.

Bayview Imaging Center

“Findings: L4-L5 disc protrusion contacting the left L5 nerve root.”

The quotation matches this fictional source. Clinical meaning still needs review.

2024-05-06 · PDF page 5

A left L4-L5 transforaminal epidural steroid injection was performed. Post-procedure pain decreased from 7/10 to 3/10.

Sunrise Spine & Pain Clinic

“Post-procedure pain reduced from 7/10 to 3/10.”

The quotation matches this fictional source. Clinical meaning still needs review.

2024-06-10 · PDF page 2

The follow-up records walking and driving limits and continued modified duty. Its pronouns vary; verify identity and attribution.

Fictional follow-up record

“Driving is limited to 20 minutes.”

The quotation matches this fictional source. Clinical meaning still needs review.

2024-06-10 · PDF page 6

The worker reported approximately 50% relief after the injection, pain 4/10, and continued modified duty.

Sunrise Spine & Pain Clinic

“Work status: Continued modified duty. Re-evaluate in 6 weeks.”

The quotation matches this fictional source. Clinical meaning still needs review.

Take the sample with you

Preview the fictional report draft and its sources

These fixed chronology examples contain five selected fictional entries from the same packet. They retain source quotes and separate citation checks from physician review. They are fixed samples; the review buttons above do not change them.

Prepare the opinion after reviewing the evidence

The reported denial of prior injury still needs verification. It does not establish causation, apportionment, permanent impairment, or maximum medical improvement. Lexamed keeps those conclusions with the evaluator.

Causation

Evaluator opinion and explanation required.

Apportionment

Evaluator opinion and explanation required.

Maximum medical improvement

Evaluator opinion and explanation required.

Test the application

Homepage explainer transcript · 3 minutes

This is the full narration of the homepage product explainer. Watch it on the homepage or download the video.

Read the video transcript

The records for a medical-legal case show up as one production. Call it two thousand pages. Progress notes, MRI reports, a deposition, and then the same MRI report again, pasted into notes by different providers. The history you have to write is in there somewhere. And the deadline started when the packet arrived.

Lexamed reads the whole production and hands you back a chronology with a page number on every line. You still do the reading and the judging. The assembling is what it takes off your desk.

Drop the production in the way it arrived. Lexamed splits it into individual documents and runs OCR on scanned pages. Then it collapses the duplicates: the retyped copies, a report served twice, and a study later notes quote word for word. You see that study once, with the original report as its source.

Here is the chronology. Each line has a date, what kind of event it was, a short summary, and the page it came from. Click the page number and the record opens next to it, with the passage highlighted, so you can check the summary against the source without leaving the timeline. Lexamed already did that check once itself. A line is marked verified when the citation matches its page. It is unverified when Lexamed could not confirm it, so you know where to look harder.

Flags are the things you would normally find on page fourteen hundred at eleven at night. A gap in treatment. An old injury to the same body part. A lumbar record dated before the injury date. A page count that does not match the declaration. Lexamed points at them. Whether they matter is your call.

You can also ask the record a question the way you would ask a colleague who had read it. When was radicular pain first documented? You get an answer with the pages it came from, and you can open each one. Ask another question, such as whether surgery was recommended. If the record does not answer, it tells you that rather than filling in a guess.

When you sit down to write, the history of injury and the prior history are already drafted from the record, with citations. Causation, apportionment, and impairment are empty on purpose. Lexamed will not write those, because the report goes out over your signature. Export the chronology and the draft, and finish the report the way you always have.

Lexamed has a free trial. You get the full workspace, and there is nothing to set up. Start the free trial at lexamed.ai.